Art is useless



Art is useless.

I firmly, completely believe that. But, I also believe that it's the most important thing that we have in life. It might be useless, but to me, creativity and self-expression are more important than anything else.

Some people think that fashion is shallow, that design doesn't matter. That material things are pointless and that I should be 'doing something more worthwhile with my life'. That's last point is the one that pisses me off that most actually. I'm clever, but I've got used to people thinking that I have absolutely no sense of what's important in the world because I write about beautiful pairs of shoes.


Honestly, I think that's really very sad. Because all of those things are a wonderful way to express yourself (just watch me express myself in those shoes on my birthday). They're art. I don't buy nice things because I want 'nice things'. I buy things because they're beautiful and the beauty is what makes me happy. You might not see it, you might not agree with my taste or even 'get' fashion. Honestly, I don't get fashion a lot of the time. I'm not a fashion blogger. I write about design and interiors and (hopefully) make that accessible to others on Domestic Sluttery. Because that's what I'm passionate about. I often don't see a pair of shoes, or an overpriced sofa. The function isn't always the first thing I see. I usually see the art first.


I don't think things are always meant to be solely functional. If I did, I'd buy my furniture in Ikea. All of my shoes would be black (I only own one pair of black shoes). I probably wouldn't own this breakfast set. But I can see the grace and elegance and discipline behind something that is both beautiful and functional. To me, that's when something stops being art and becomes design. And that transformation blows my mind.

I don't think a pair of shoes will change the world. But I do think your enjoyment of something beautiful can change your day. Whether that enjoyment comes from staring at Monet's lilies in the Tate Modern, or from pressing your nose up against the window of Chanel, it's a good thing. And yeah, actually I think that can change the world a little bit. A photograph can change your life. A song can break your heart. Books can do whatever you want them to do. Films can... well they just can, can't they?



We interact with creativity. Whether it's music, or a blog post on a website, a clever online meme. We like things that make us smile. We like getting our hands dirty. We like making stuff (and baking stuff). We like touching things. I think that last point is the most important. Touch and texture are so important to us. We touch things without even realise we're doing it. When we're browsing in a shop, we'll touch the sweater that looks soft. When we find someone attractive, we'll find any excuse we can to touch their arm. It's completely natural for us to interact with something that we find beautiful. So much of creativity is about that.

You might not even understand what someone else sees as 'art' (I'll never understand the fuss around Christopher Kane, Radiohead or Constable). That doesn't mean that it's not art. And it doesn't mean it's not important. When we're talking about something commercial, that someone else has put a recognisable value on, it's more complicated. Because we compare that value to something we see as important. We'll say "I could buy a car for that much!" and we justify our argument that way. I just don't think the monetary value is the argument we should be having. Forcing your own values onto someone else won't make them agree with you. Don't just tell me something is ugly. Tell me what excites you.

Art is useless. Art absolutely has no definable purpose. It has no concrete value, and it is, of course, utterly futile. But it makes us happy. It brightens our day, every single day, most of the time without us even realising. It matters.


At the start of this post, I quoted Stephen Fry saying that art was useless. He the same thing about love as well. Dude had a point.

The shoes are from Kurt Geiger and they're heavenly. Waterlilies was nicked from erm... Monet (sorry, Dude). Go see it at the Tate Modern, it'll blow your mind. The love print is from the wonderfully talented Coulson Macleod and I've been coveting it for the last year. Even though it's utterly useless.

10 comments:

Charles 29 September 2010 10:34  

I disagree with Stephen Fry, actually. He's saying that because Wilde said it, or something similar, and he's a massive Wilde fanboy. Wilde was obviously hugely verbally dextrous, and I love his writing, but there's a big hole at the heart of it, a lot of the time. It's all surface, all the time. That kind of statement is symptomatic of why I like, respect and laugh at Wilde's work, but can't love it.

Art is absolutely not useless. It has a specific, vital function in human society, and has done throughout history.

Good art, whether it's a book, a painting, fashion or whatever, can encourage thought, and empathy, and compassion, and lots of other good, nourishing things. It can make you feel less alone, or look at something in a different way, or from another person's perspective. Basically, it can make you a better person.

And that's not a nice additional extra to your day, as you seem to be saying. That's the basis on which human society works. Otherwise we're all stuck in our own heads, fear and mistrust each other and our lives get nasty, brutish and short a la Hobbes.

Siany 29 September 2010 10:39  

"And yeah, actually I think that can change the world a little bit. A photograph can change your life. A song can break your heart. Books can do whatever you want them to do. Films can... well they just can, can't they?"

As I said, that 'extra addition to your day' can change the world.

Charles 29 September 2010 10:51  

So it does have a concrete purpose and isn't useless or futile?

This is my whole problem with Wilde. Clever wordplay, but the whole thing comes tumbling down logically when you think about it for a moment.

Possibly this is a problem of semantics - a particular piece of art doesn't need to have a purpose (although some do). Art as a concept absolutely does have a concrete purpose and value to humanity and is in no way useless or futile.

Siany 29 September 2010 11:00  

I think you're right about the semantics (and there's a little bit of irony in what I'm saying as well). I quoted Stephen fry because he happened to be on the telly paraphrasing Wilde when I was thinking about this - mostly after having a stream of people telling me that what I wrote about every day didn't matter.

That's why I focus so much on the art that we see every day. I think those everyday things are important even if to an outsider, buying a pair of pretty shoes won't change the world.

Couslon Macleod 29 September 2010 12:27  

Hi Sian,

Firstly, thank you so much for mentioning us on your blog and for coveting one of our prints.

Loving your post. Weirdly, one of our latest collections uses Wilde's quote 'All Art Is Quite Useless'

http://www.coulsonmacleod.com/art/wilde/wilde-blue.html

We're being ironic. Obviously.

Siany 29 September 2010 12:49  

Obviously :-D

Sjors Timmer 29 September 2010 13:26  

In the light that we all are going to die some day (relatively soon in the long scheme of things) making or consuming art might actually be the most useful thing you can do. The world won't remember all the excel files you typed up, the countless hours you spent writing sales documentation, nor will it care about the countless times you showed up at work on time.

What matters in the long run is only your capability to leave the world behind a bit more beautiful and a bit more shiny then you found it.

So, I would argue art is the only useful thing we have, because if not for art, truth and beauty, why are we alive?

Siany 29 September 2010 13:30  

No one remembers Excel files. Everyone remembers the beautiful things.

Let's try and leave things a bit more shiny than when we found them :-)

Liv Tait @aodt 29 September 2010 22:36  

This, is truly fabulous. Other Wilde quotes include: "All that I desire to point out is the general principle that life imitates art far more than art imitates life." ...“Art is the most intense mode of individualism that the world has known." and ... "Consistency is the last refuge of the unimaginative. "

just saying...

Great great post!

plummetonions.com 30 September 2010 07:03  

I remember Excel files. They can be, to me, as gloriously elegant as Monet. I still remember a spreadsheet I developed in 1994 to easily calculate different beam loading profiles. I recently blogged about one I found awesome.

However I also agree with the comments above that while art is rarely immediately practical in the way that, say, spreadsheets can be, it's far from useless. "Use" or "benefit" or "reason" or "purpose": art can have all these.

In fact, art may ultimately be more practically useful than we think, we might just not yet understand how. For thousands of years we thought dreaming was just the brain doing random remembery, imaginary things while we slept. We've now got a pretty good idea that dreaming serves some purpose, like sorting or affirming our ideas, because if we deprive sleepers of their dream-states they start to go coo-coo. Maybe it's the same with art: if we weren't making it and enjoying it very bad things would happen.

Post a Comment

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Sian Meades

Sian Meades
I'm Sian Meades, but most people know me as Siany. I'm founding editor of the lifestyle website Domestic Sluttery and currently wedding editor for TheTimes.co.uk. I use this blog for writing about tea, social media and London things that make me happy.

You can have a read of the first chapter of my novel, nose about my press and client page, or dive into my blog.

Want to talk to me? Hire me? Publish my book? Make me a cup of tea? Then email me.

@SianySianySiany

Happy List

1. New shoes
2. Clueless
3. My own bed
4. Oh Comely
5. Midsummer Night's Dream
6. The Plan
7. Frances
8. Wonder Woman
9. London
10. Dan Rhodes